<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AOL on an Opt-out Button</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.silverpop.com/blogs/email-marketing/aol-on-an-optou.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.silverpop.com/blogs/email-marketing/aol-on-an-optou.html</link>
	<description>Email.Marketing.Automation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 12:19:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Baer</title>
		<link>http://www.silverpop.com/blogs/email-marketing/aol-on-an-optou.html/comment-page-1#comment-352</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Baer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 02:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://silverpopweb01.beacontec.com/blogs/email-marketing-new/uncategorized/aol-on-an-optou.html#comment-352</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;Not enough screen real-estate&quot; has been the number one objection I&#039;ve heard in the past as well. I thought Microsoft took an innovate approach by having their Unsubscribe/Opt-Out button REPLACE the Report Spam button. But as Charles indicates, only for trusted senders. While there are some things I would change about Microsoft&#039;s specific implementation, this seems like a good general approach. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There is more discussion about this at http://www.list-unsubscribe.com/&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Not enough screen real-estate&#8221; has been the number one objection I&#8217;ve heard in the past as well. I thought Microsoft took an innovate approach by having their Unsubscribe/Opt-Out button REPLACE the Report Spam button. But as Charles indicates, only for trusted senders. While there are some things I would change about Microsoft&#8217;s specific implementation, this seems like a good general approach. </p>
<p>There is more discussion about this at <a href="http://www.list-unsubscribe.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.list-unsubscribe.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

