Silverpop | Engagement Marketing Solutions  -  From First Click to Lifetime Customer
Home   |   Support   |   Partners   |   News/Events   |   Contact   |   CLIENT LOGIN
English   |   Deutsch
Demand Generation Blog
Subscribe to this blog
Subscribe by Email
Subscribe by RSS Add this blog to your RSS reader
     
Home > Blogs > Demand Generation > October 2009 Archives

October 2009 Archives

« September 2009 | Main | November 2009 »

October 27, 2009

B2B Thought Leadership with Neil Edwards

Neil%20Edwards.jpgThrough these special blog postings, our goal is to offer advice and insights from top B2B marketers. It is my pleasure to introduce you to Neil Edwards, a chartered marketer and fellow of the Chartered Institute of Marketing. He has worked on a number of well-known brands in the UK and the U.S. during a varied career with The Royal Bank of Scotland Group and now with his own business, The Marketing Eye.

Neil offers a pragmatic, entrepreneurial, and intelligent approach to marketing, and I'm sure you’ll learn a lot from his responses to our questions. Enjoy.

1.) What strategy have you seen work the best for connecting sales and marketing teams?
Sales and marketing teams need to communicate often and earn mutual respect. By engaging with sales and drawing on its knowledge of what customers want and respond to, marketing can develop buyer-centric campaigns that sales will want to support. Similarly, sales can learn to accept the strategic direction set by marketing in terms of key messages and target markets.

In sales-led organisations, I have always focused on developing a rigid process that gives sales a set period of notice before a campaign goes out. The objectives of the campaign, the key messages and the creative are all communicated, the prospects that are being contacted are circulated, and the database carved up and allocated for follow-up. Once the campaign has landed, the sales function identifies a day to dedicate itself to making 1:1 contact with the prospects that have been targeted. Results are collated afterwards and success is celebrated together.

Sales and marketing need to combine to form a powerful business development unit that works as one to nurture a prospect from target name through to customer.

2.) What metrics have you seen work best for tracking and measuring the ROI of lead-management programs?
Ultimately, the only true measure of success is sales conversions, but ROI, as measured by sales income, is too blunt a measure of success in the short term. We have to recognise that in B2B, it is rare to convert a business from prospect to customer in one hit: There are several steps along the way, and it is necessary to set goals for the degrees of engagement. In the first instance, these goals can be: opening rates on email campaigns, click-throughs on links and downloads of product information. Further along the line it is the results of targeted follow-up of the names that have shown the first signs of interest—perhaps agreement to a meeting or a product demonstration.

Lead-scoring and lead-nurturing mechanisms are in their early days, but it is exciting to see businesses like Silverpop and The Annuitas Group working toward systems that work.

3.) If you were going to do only one thing, what part of a B2B lead-management program would you implement (demand generation, lead scoring, lead nurturing or ROI measurement)?
Lead nurturing, without a doubt. While we are nowhere without the initial demand, in the scheme of things, generating a contact is relatively easy. The challenge is turning the contact into a client. We have to have systems and methodologies that enable sales and marketing to constantly and appropriately increase the level of engagement to the point where the sale is made.

4.) Which business practices are working best in B2B lead generation today, and which would you like to disappear?
The practices and hence the campaigns that work best are the ones that have buyer relevance at their core. This means identifying the issues that are important to the prospect and owning the conversation that surrounds them. Whether it is with email campaigns, press releases, blog posts or advertising, the organisations that understand and incorporate buyer relevance into their communications will be the ones that win.

My perpetual hope is that one day we will see an end to the sniping between sales and marketing. Too many organisations operate with a blame culture: Marketing blaming sales for not backing its campaigns and sales seeing marketing as disconnected from the real world, generating no leads or leads it can’t do anything with. Come on guys, we’re all in this together—let’s have a coffee!

5.) What's your advice to marketers working with executives who view marketing as a discretionary budget item during a recession?
Marketers need to present requests for budgets in ways that are aligned to the strategic goals of the business. Unfortunately there are still too many people in marketing with insufficient commercial acumen. A proposal for an advertising campaign or trade show in isolation can look like a flight of fancy and will be deservedly knocked back. However, presented as part of an integrated strategy that shows the activity as an integral part of moving prospects through a planned engagement process, it will make sense to even the most parsimonious CEO or CFO.

These are tough times for many organisations, and marketing can’t spend what doesn’t exist. More intelligent targeting, for example, by identifying niches or top-slicing prospect pools; better use of lower cost methodologies, such as e-mail campaigns and social media; and, most importantly of all, avoiding the waste that is inherent in generating leads that aren’t effectively nurtured and converted, are all ways of adapting a plan to a reduced budget and maximising the ROI.

October 15, 2009

B2B Thought Leadership Questions for Dennis Head, eDemand Leads

denny_head.jpg
Through these special blog postings, our goal is to offer advice and insights from top B2B marketers. It is my pleasure to introduce you to Dennis Head, a consultant for eDemand Leads Consulting LLC.

Dennis has a unique perspective from both sales and marketing regarding lead generation. He has over thirty years of executive sales leadership experience with companies like Xerox, IBM, ROLM, Octel and Lucent coupled with over 8 years in marketing as Avaya’s Director of Lead Generation where his “lead refinery process” generated more than $1.6 billion in sales qualified leads. I'm sure you'll want to hear what he has to say.


1.) What strategy have you seen work the best for connecting sales and marketing teams?
Things tend to work best when the two teams understand their roles. Sales is marketing's client. And sales can't cold call its way to success. After this, the two teams must align their thoughts around what lead quality is.

Marketing automation solutions make it easier to hold each team accountable for their responsibilities. It's easy to find out if sales isn't working the qualified opportunities it receives from marketing. The teams may need to meet again and readjust their quality levels.

2.) What metrics have you seen work best for tracking and measuring the ROI of lead-management programs?
The conversion rates from marketing-qualified leads to sales-qualified leads. Once you have a consistent qualification process, you can then work your ROI backwards and ask yourself: "What are my different lead sources?" This will help you figure out what percentage of those lead sources became qualified. What's the cost of the initial inquiry? You can then figure out what your average cost per lead is, and that's when your ROI comes back to tell you where you spent your money.

3.) If you were going to do only one thing, what part of a B2B lead-management program would you implement (demand generation, lead scoring, lead nurturing, ROI measurement)?
I'd use lead scoring and lead nurturing to ensure the sales team receives quality leads. If you don't have quality, you won't have credibility with the sales team. Fewer but higher quality leads are far better than a high quantity of poor-quality leads.

4.) Which business practices are working best in B2B lead generation today, and which would you like to disappear?
Closed-loop processes are working best. I'd like to see marketers stop measuring the wrong things. Measuring the total number of leads is ridiculous. So what if you deliver 1,000 leads to your salespeople if they aren't working them?

5.) What's your advice to marketers working with execs who view marketing as a discretionary budget item during a recession?
You have to prove to the C-Suite that what you're doing is impacting revenue, and you can do that with metrics. With a fine-tooth comb, you must analyze what you put into the marketplace. For example, if you spend $20K on a trade show booth, you really need to make sure you get something out of it besides a pocket full of business cards. You need to close deal.

October 11, 2009

Seven Principles for Building More Buyer-centric B2B Marketing Programs

This week marks the first stop in our new B2B Marketing University series -- a program we're taking on the road to help educate marketers about a rapidly-changing B2B environment. We have great content and great partners for Palo Alto (and also for our upcoming events in Boston, Atlanta and Seattle) that will cover a number of new strategies and tactics for addressing these dynamics. (Hope you'll join us.)

Success with these new strategies and tactics requires embracing the context surrounding the 'brave new world' of B2B marketing that we face today. In particular -- and at the core of this brave new world -- is a changing B2B buyer. I've covered this in two recent blog posts -- one post looking at the data that supports a changing buyer on my Propelling Brands blog and a second post here on the Demand Generation blog that captured some of the implications. "[I]t's impossible to talk about a changing environment for marketing technology without talking about how the nature of the B2B buyer also is rapidly changing," I noted in my Propelling Brands post. "The two are inextricably intertwined in a new reality that is both a cause and effect of the digital age we live in."

Recognizing, understanding and responding to this change at a buyer level substantially helps focus our marketing programs. It reminds us that being 'buyer-centric' is critical and that effective B2B marketing -- given a permanent shift in buyer power -- must mold around this process and respond to buyer pull, rather than attempting interruptive and disingenuous 'push' tactics.

"In the future [marketing] is all about conversations," commented Richard Bush of Base One at an EMEA B2B conference for Silverpop I hosted this past week in London. (BTW -- If you are interested in checking out our B2B dialogue in London last week, do a Twitter search under hash tag 'SVPcc09.')

This is the context I've covered in my past posts. But how can B2B marketers better respond to this evolving environment?

Given this question, what I wanted to do with the rest of today's post is to take this to the next logical step and explore ways that we as marketers we can put the buyer in the center of our programs.


What are some of the core principles for building more buyer-centric marketing programs?

I've been collecting insights over the past few weeks -- both from reports and texts I've read, as well as from direct interactions with B2B marketers as I've been on the road. What appears below are an emerging set of seven principles I think are a good start toward making sure your B2B marketing programs are as buyer-centric as possible.


1 > Make sure you have a complete picture of your buyer's information-seeking behavior -- both upstream and downstream: This may seem like an obvious place to start, but this perspective too often gets lost in the mix. If we're talking about being buyer-centric, then buyer insights must drive our B2B marketing. We should be designing dynamic campaigns that are anticipatory, that take advantage of gaps in the buyer-education process and that are constructed more as dialogue than as a battle-like 'campaign.'

I often refer to this as 'critical path analysis.' It can be complex to put together, but it helps to clarify the mediums, messages and voices appropriate to engaging with a buyer at all stages of dialogue.

Some questions I would ask: Where do buyers start their search for information? Where do they move from there? And after that? What channels do they leverage for advice, to shape their idea of what they need and to identify which vendors are ideal candidates to meet this need? Which communication channels are accessed at different stages of the buying process? What is the nature of the 'dialogue' at each stage.

Modern B2B marketing is so much more than mere 'lead generation.' Successful marketers are shifting to managing the upstream buyer dialogue ... but you have to know who you're talking to and how to effectively engage with them, based on where the buyer wants to take the dialogue.


2 > Rationalize your strategy for marketing communication (and for sales team engagement) against your buyer's critical path: Once you have a real sense of your buyer's behavior throughout the pre-sales information-seeking process, you're ready to make choices. And you should. It's a waste to spend budget on any communication medium that does not align with this process.

Identifying these correlations can take some work. It's important to go back and look at past marketing activities and then run correlation analysis and regressions against those activities that were most predictive of buyer conversion. I'll say, too, that this can be difficult to get a complete picture of, but it is one benefit of a robust marketing automation platform -- the ability to track activities, to map them back to purchases and then to be able to run cross-tabulation against this activity.

If you're doing this analysis prior to deploying a marketing automation platform, then this may require correlating multiple, disparate data sources -- ranging from sophisticated databases and transaction registers to random spreadsheets. For instance, you may have to go back and compare registration lists from Webinars to who became a customer. Your analysis should also look at the timing and pacing of buyers' campaign interactions.

This analysis can be a lot of work, but it is worth it. It also can prove to be a good excuse for engaging the sales team in the dialogue -- getting their perspectives on tactics and campaigns (such as a white paper or a specific event) that had really good results.


3 > Use personas to get leverage in your buyer-centric marketing program design: The reality is that you probably aren't going to be able to analyze and identify every single critical path for every single situation, which means you can't develop an infinite number of campaigns to cover every eventuality. So then the question becomes one of how you can better scale this strategy and program design. I believe a critical tool is the concept of persona -- a concept Patricia Seybold has long been an advocate of and that has even more relevance than ever today.

In a nutshell, personas allow you to identify and define common critical paths that exist -- assigning a persona that estimates this average path for a given segment of buyers. Defining personas also will tell you a lot about the segmentation of your customer base. So it serves a dual purpose -- focusing both strategy and tactics. It's also important to note that good persona definition covers all of the bases -- demographics, implicit/behavioral characteristics and core BANT (budget, authority, needs and timing) insights.

"We live in a time when customers are under unceasing pressure to do things more quickly, to cram more into each day," comments Seybold in a May 2001 Harvard Business Review article. "By thinking broadly about the challenges your customers face, rather than narrowly about what you can sell them, you can almost always find ways to make their lives easier."

Persona definition ideally should include significant sales team input. Persona definition also can be coupled with lead score model development. There is a critical link between identifying the characteristics of a persona and of mapping that back to an effective lead score model -- a critical element of improving your overall lead management strategy.


4 > Pay attention to content; keep it fresh and grounded in specific personas and their critical paths: In B2B marketing we often are guilty of developing marketing communication materials that attempt to speak to anyone and everyone; moreover, we often engage with materials that are out of sequence from how a B2B buyer prefers to operate. (Take a look at an average B2B company's website!) This is a missed opportunity to improve your buyer-centricity. Content development is one of the top issues B2B marketers face, but it's often because they develop content in a vacuum.

Understanding your buyer and developing personas to scale your buyer interactions not only helps you rationalize the mediums and tactics you deploy, it also helps you rationalize the text at various stages. For example, whether an e-mail should come from a marketer, a sales person or a product/service representative depends on the message being delivered and how far along in the process a buyer is. The voice of sales is absolutely appropriate the further along a prospect gets in his/her process, but it can be totally inappropriate earlier in the process.

Keys to managing content include: 1.) rationalizing against personas, 2.) speaking to the proper buying stage, 3.) choosing the right voice and (perhaps most importantly) 4.) keeping the content fresh and relevant to the current buying environment. Content must be current to the themes and issues marketers are facing right now, not a week or month or year ago. Being in the moment is critical.


5 > Start (but don't stop) with e-mail: There is no question e-mail is one of the best mediums for managing buyer-centric marketing programs. Hands-down, no question. E-mail is dynamic, trigger-able and personalize-able. E-mail is also very cost-effective and has great ROI. Finally -- and most importantly -- e-mail is unquestionably a common-denominator when it comes to your arsenal of communications tactics. Every B2B buyer communicates via e-mail these days.

E-mail also is an important external and internal 'bridge' in B2B marketing communications. Externally, e-mail is a critical medium for communicating in the middle 1/3 to 2/3 of the buying process. In fact, this is why e-mail nurturing programs are so effective. It's a low-risk way to communicate between a buyer doing initial research upstream and wanting to have a sales dialogue downstream. Internally, e-mail can serve as a great starting place for developing true dynamic campaigns and for building sophisticated marketing automation.

Yet e-mail does not exist in a vacuum. It's a great place to start, but it's important to consider what role e-mail plays in your buyer's process versus other channels. It's also important to engage the buyer via these other channels and to sync e-mail activities so that they're part of integrated marketing communication.


6 > Leverage a strategic lead management approach to help keep it running smoothly: Operationalizing buyer-centricity means thinking about the repetitive activities, steps, gates and hand-offs that define the development of a lead from the rawest stage to being ready to purchase. As marketers we are going to shape this lead by managing buyer-focused dialogue upstream, but we need a way to manage this process and to measure our in-process results.

Lead management is the right strategy for this -- helping to codify and put quantitative characteristics against leads, their stages and their appropriate routing. Key aspects of lead management include: information capture, scoring, routing, nurturing and monitoring. (These are fully explained in a lead management strategy workbook developed by my colleagues at Silverpop. Click here to download this if you're interested.)

By helping to manage and measure the progression of a lead, lead management is a critical link for managing buyer-centric marketing campaigns and to making sure that buyer dialogue is most appropriate to where a buyer really is in his/her process.


7 > Embrace processes and systems to enable you to scale your buyer-centric marketing programs and to achieve efficient lead management: I'll say it. It's impossible to manage mass one-to-one dialogue and execute near-100% buyer-pull campaigns without the right platform. You just can't. Particularly if you want to get to any type of granularity around personas or want to dynamically score and route leads. And especially if you're dealing in a highly-multi-channel context.

There is so much potential to refine the results of your marketing -- once you've got a buyer-centered strategy -- but there is no way to realize that potential without the right processes and systems.

This is the key role a marketing automation platform plays in effective B2B marketing in the current environment.


What are your own experiences with building buyer-centric marketing programs? What do you believe are best practices to embrace? Please share your thoughts.

Whitepaper
Newsletter
Get exclusive news and best practices with our free e-newsletter.
Sign Up
Resources
More Resources
Check out Silverpop's Resource Center for the latest white papers, industry studies, case studies, and much more!

Resources